California Call Recording Laws

Protecting Your Rights Against Illegal Phone Recordings

california recording laws

In California, it is unlawful to record a confidential conversation, including private conversations or telephone calls, without obtaining the consent of all parties involved. California is a two-party consent state. Violating this law constitutes the crime of eavesdropping under Penal Code 632 PC.

Recording communications in a public gathering is generally permissible. Additionally, certain exceptions apply to law enforcement officers and some private citizens who record conversations to gather evidence of an offense.

If you believe that your telephone conversation has been recorded illegally, contact a California consumer protection attorney for a free consultation. 

California has some of the most stringent wiretapping laws in the country. Recorded conversations without the consent of all parties involved are not admissible as evidence and can lead to legal consequences. The California Penal Code 632 also grants consumers the right to seek compensation for each recorded call that violates the code.

You may have noticed disclaimers such as “This call is being recorded for quality purposes” before speaking with a credit card lender, bank, collection agency, or another company. These disclaimers are a result of the California eavesdropping or recording statute.

If you don’t hear a recording phone calls disclaimer, it is advisable to inquire whether the call is being recorded. If you discover that you have been recorded without your consent, you may be eligible to claim damages for each recorded call. 

What’s the Difference Between Wiretapping and Eavesdropping? 

Under California’s invasion of privacy laws, there is a distinction between eavesdropping and wiretapping. 

Eavesdropping refers to the act of intentionally overhearing or recording a private conversation without the consent of all parties involved. It typically involves listening in on or taping conversations in person or over the phone without the knowledge or permission of the participants.

Wiretapping, on the other hand, specifically pertains to the interception and monitoring of electronic communications, such as phone calls, text messages, or other electronic data transmissions, without the permission of all parties involved. Wiretapping involves the unauthorized interception of communications using electronic devices or wire communication facilities.

While both eavesdropping and wiretapping involve the invasion of privacy by intercepting or recording conversations, eavesdropping typically refers to in-person or telephone-based interceptions, while wiretapping specifically involves the unauthorized interception of electronic communications. 

It is important to note that both actions are generally illegal under California law without the consent of all parties involved, except in specific circumstances where consent is not required, such as lawful police investigations under certain conditions.

Can You Sue Someone for Recording You Without Your Permission in California?

You may have grounds to sue someone or a company for recording you without your permission under certain circumstances. California’s law, specifically Penal Code 632, prohibits the recording of confidential communications without the consent of all parties involved. 

To find someone guilty of recording a conversation without consent in California, certain elements must be established. These elements include:

  • Confidential Communication. The conversation being recorded must be considered confidential. Confidential communication generally refers to a conversation where the parties have a reasonable expectation of privacy. This could include private conversations, telephone calls, or any communication where the participants believe that the conversation was not to be overheard or recorded and is meant to be only between the parties to the conversation. 
  • Lack of Consent. The recording must be done without the consent of all parties involved. California’s phone conversations law requires the consent of all parties to a confidential communication before it can be lawfully recorded. If any participant in the conversation is unaware that they are being recorded or has not given their consent, it may be considered illegal.
  • Intent. The person who made the recording must have the intent to eavesdrop on or intercept the communication. If the recording was made accidentally or without the intent to violate privacy, it may not meet the requirements under California recording laws.
  • Use an Electronic Device. The accused person must have used an electronic recording device to secretly record the conversation in California. Some examples of electronic devices include telephones, computers, video recording equipment, and microphones. 

If a bank, lender, collection agency, or debt collection attorney has recorded you without your consent in a private telephone call, you may be considered the “injured party” under the law. As the injured party, you have the right to take legal action against the person who unlawfully recorded you.

What is the Penalty for Illegally Recording Someone in California?

Victims of illegally recorded conversations are entitled to civil damages of $5,000 for each call that was recorded in violation of the law. This means that if you can establish that your privacy rights were violated, you may be eligible to claim $5,000 in damages for each recorded call.

Consulting with a qualified attorney who is familiar with California’s recording laws can provide you with accurate legal advice based on your situation.

For personalized legal guidance regarding your situation, consult with a qualified attorney.

What Should You Do If You Believe You’ve Been Recorded Without Consent?

If you suspect that you have been recorded without your consent in California, it is important to take appropriate steps to protect your rights. Here are some recommended actions:

  1. Preserve Evidence and Identify the Company. Make a note of the circumstances surrounding the recording, including the date, time, location, and any other relevant details. If the recording occurred during a phone call or communication with a specific company, ensure you gather the name of the company, their phone number, and any related information. Additionally, collect any supporting evidence such as phone records, text messages, or witness statements to bolster your case.
  2. Consult with an Attorney. Contact an experienced attorney who practices consumer protection and debt collection violation laws. They can evaluate your case, provide legal advice, and guide you on the appropriate course of action based on your specific recording or wiretap case.
  3. Document Your Concerns. Write down a detailed account regarding the unauthorized recording. Include any potential damages or harm you have suffered as a result of the failure to obtain your consent for legally recording the call. 
  4. Report the Incident. If you believe the recording was conducted by an individual or entity that may be subject to regulatory oversight, such as a collection agency, consider filing a complaint with the relevant regulatory agency or authority.
  5. Explore Legal Remedies. Depending on the nature and severity of the violation, you may have legal recourse. An attorney can assess whether you have grounds for a civil lawsuit seeking damages or other appropriate remedies.

Every case is unique, and the best course of action will depend on the specific circumstances. Consulting with a debt defense lawyer in California is invaluable to understanding your rights and pursuing the appropriate legal avenues to protect you and your family.

If you suspect that you have been recorded without your consent, it is vital to take prompt action. Contact Kazerouni Law Group for a free consultation and case evaluation by filling out our online contact form or calling us at (949) 404-4228. We are here to assess your situation and provide you with the necessary legal guidance.

Free Evaluation

Disclaimer: The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

What Our Clients Say

“Kazerouni Law Group worked with us when no other law firm would because they believed in our case. Their lawyers were all extremely responsive and seemed to always be available for us. Most importantly they got us a result that we thought was unachievable.”
Silhouette - Female - Reviews
Los Angeles
“There are two things that I look for in a lawyer – 1. a lawyer that cares about his client and his needs and 2. a lawyer that I can trust. Every KLG lawyer that I have interacted with in the last 2 years has shown me both those qualities in abundance.”
Silhouette - Male - Reviews
“…thanks for taking the stress off my shoulders, you guys are the best…”
Silhouette - Male - Reviews
M Mohammadi
“The lawyers care, the lawyers are great at their job and I trust them – enough said.”
Silhouette - Male - Reviews



Knutson v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Cell Phone Privacy


Couser v. Comenity Bank.
Invasion of Privacy


Lapuebla v. Birchbox
Illegally Renewed Subscriptions

Contact Kazerouni Law Group

Talk with an attorney from our firm free of charge.

Scroll to Top