Kazerouni Law Group, APC A Consumer Protection Law Firm
Free Evaluation
We have obtained more than $500 million for consumers nationwide.
10.0Mohammad Reza Kazerouni


On January 24, 2014, the Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, denied defendant Progressive Casualty Insurance Company's Motions to Dismiss and Strike in the matter of Olney v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, 13-cv-2058 GPC (NLS). Read the full Order here. In Olney, plaintiff Olney alleges that Progressive violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. ("TCPA") by calling Olney on Olney's cellular telephone while using an autodialer in conjunction with prerecorded voices. The purpose of Progressive's telephonic communications was to collect an alleged debt alleged to be owed by an unknown third party. In response to Olney's allegations, Progressive argued that (i) Olney lacked standing since Olney was not the "intended recipient" of the calls; and, (ii) the TCPA does not apply to the debt collection calls at issue.

Intended Recipient - Judge Curiel quickly rejected this argument while noting the plethora of case law to the contrary. For example, Judge Curiel cited Breslow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 857 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (S.D. Fla 2012) stating that "companies who make automated calls bear the responsibility of regularly checking the accuracy of their account records or placing intermittent live verification calls...[I]t seems to the Court that entities like [the defendant]...are in a much better position to bear this responsibility than are individuals." Judge Curiel's Order, page 5, lines 21-24. Therefore, this argument was rejected.

The TCPA Applies to Debt Collection Calls - This argument was also rejected by Judge Curiel based upon both binding case law and public policy. Judge Curiel stated "[a]cknowledging that debt collectors are exempt from liability under TCPA, regardless of whose cell phone number is called, would leave without redress an individual who receives prerecorded messages simply because he has a phone number that previously belongs to a debtor." See page 10, lines 5-9 of Judge Curiel's Order. Therefore, this argument was rejected.

Based upon the discussion above, Judge Curiel rejected Progressive's Motions.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Great Results!

We have obtained more than $500 million for consumers nationwide over the past five years.

See Our Results

Advocating For You And Your Family

You will receive personal service and attention throughout your case from experienced attorneys. Learn about your rights and how we can protect you. Call 866-855-6173 to arrange a free evaluation with our lawyers or contact us online.

Contact Us Today!

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

The Highest Standard Of Legal Excellence

Contact Information

Costa Mesa Office
245 Fischer Avenue
Suite D1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Toll Free: 866-855-6173
Phone: 949-612-9999
Fax: 1-800-520-5523
Costa Mesa Law Office Map

Dallas Office
1910 Pacific Ave
Suite 14155
Dallas, TX 75201

Map & Directions

San Diego Office
2221 Camino del Rio South
Suite 101
San Diego, CA 92108

Toll Free: 866-855-6173
Fax: 1-800-520-5523
Map & Directions

Burbank Office
2600 West Olive Avenue
5th Floor
Burbank, CA 91505

Toll Free: 866-855-6173
Fax: 1-800-520-5523
Map & Directions

Arroyo Grande Office
1303 East Grand Avenue
Suite 201A
Arroyo Grande, CA 93420

Toll Free: 866-855-6173
Fax: 1-800-520-5523
Map & Directions

St. George Office
169 W 2170 S Cir.
Suite 204D
St. George, UT 84790

Map & Directions

Las Vegas Office
6069 South Fort Apache Road
Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89148

Map & Directions

Phoenix Office
2633 E. Indian School Road
Suite 460
Phoenix, AZ 85016

Map & Directions


The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or as forming an attorney-client relationship. No attorney-client relationship between the reader and Kazerouni Law Group APC is created by this site, and no reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content in this site.

Review Us

Additional Offices

Follow Online