Kazerouni Law Group, APC A Consumer Protection Law Firm
866-855-6173
Free Evaluation
We have obtained more than $300 million for consumers nationwide.
10.0Mohammad Reza Kazerouni

February 2014 Archives

BANK OF AMERICA CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC APPROVED BY FEDERAL JUDGE

On February 13, 2014, the Honorable John A. Houston approved a class action settlement obtained by the Kazerouni Law Group, APC in Hoffman, et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., 12-cv-539 JAH (DHB). [A copy of Judge Houston's Order may be found here]. InHoffman, the plaintiffs alleged that defendant Bank of America recorded California consumers without said consumers' knowledge and/or consent in violation of California Penal Code § 632. Following months of strenuous litigation, the Parties finally reached an amicable resolution. The Kazerouni Law Group, APC believes that this decision is of great benefit in protecting California consumers from further invasions of privacy.

FEDERAL JUDGE AFFIRMS RULING IN FAVOR OF KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC IN DISCOVERY DISPUTE WITH HEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY GROUP LLC

In a major victory for California consumers, the Honorable Richard Seeborg of the United States District Court, Northern District of California affirmed U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathaneal M. Cousin's Order requiring Defendant Healthcare Revenue Recovery Group LLC to produce documents relating to plaintiff Webb's TCPA class action. See the full Order here. At issue were two categories of evidence: (1) the defendant's outbound dial list; and, (2) documents pertaining to defendant's "prior express consent" affirmative defense. Following argument by the Parties, Judge Seeborg ruled that Plaintiff was entitled to these documents since the documents will be at issue in Plaintiff's eventual Motion for Class Certification. As such, to withhold the requested documents would unfairly prejudice Plaintiff.

KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC DEFEATS YAHOO!, INC.'S ATTEMPT TO DISMISS CLASS ACTION

On February 3, 2014, the Honorable Gonzalo P. Curiel of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, denied defendant Yahoo!, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment in the matter of Sherman v. Yahoo!, Inc., 13-cv-41 GPC (WVG). Read the full Order here. In Sherman, plaintiff Sherman alleges that Yahoo! violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. ("TCPA") by texting Sherman using an autodialer. In moving for Summary Judgment, Yahoo! argued that a single text message could not violate the TCPA. See Judge Curiel's Order, page 6, lines 15-16. After reviewing relevant case law, Judge Curiel quickly concluded that "absent prior express consent, a single call or text with the use of an ATDS may be actionable under the TCPA." Id. at pages 8-9, lines 28-1. Thereafter, Yahoo! argued that Yahoo!'s dialing equipment did not satisfy the TCPA's definition of an ATDS which is "equipment that has the capacity (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers." 47 U.S.C. § 227(a)(1). Here, Yahoo! claimed that the "Yahoo! server and system is not an ATDS because it does not have the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number, nor can it dial such numbers. Judge Curiel's Order, page 10, lines 10-13. Judge Curiel disregarded this argument based upon Ninth Circuit authority which held that "the focus of the inquiry in evaluating whether a technology is considered an ATDS is whether the equipment has the capacity to store and dial phone numbers." Id. at pages 11-12, lines 27-1. Moreover, Judge Curiel also rejected Yahoo!'s ATDS argument acknowledge that a "predictive dialer [like the one used by Yahoo!] is considered an ATDS under the TCPA." Id. at page 9, lines 23-24. Finally, Judge Curiel summarily rejected Yahoo!'s "Good Samaritan" argument made pursuant to the Communication Decency Act ("CDA"), 47 U.S.C. § 230, et seq. Judge Curiel found the the Good Samaritan Immunity claim unavailing since the CDA was enacted "'to control the exposure of minors to indecent material' material on the Internet." Id. at page 12, lines 19-21. Here, no such issues were present; thus, the CDA did not apply. Id. at pages 14-15, lines 19-2.
.
Based upon the discussion above, Judge Curiel denied Yahoo!'s Motion.

Great Results!

We have obtained more than $300 million for consumers nationwide over the past five years.

See Our Results

Advocating For You And Your Family

You will receive personal service and attention throughout your case from experienced attorneys. Learn about your rights and how we can protect you. Call 866-855-6173 to arrange a free evaluation with our lawyers or contact us online.

Contact Us Today!

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

The Highest Standard Of Legal Excellence

Contact Information

Costa Mesa Office
245 Fischer Avenue
Suite D1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Toll Free: 866-855-6173
Toll Free: 1-800-400-6808
Phone: 949-612-9999
Fax: 1-800-520-5523
Costa Mesa Law Office Map

St. George Office
169 W 2170 S Cir.
Suite 204D
St. George, UT 84790

Map & Directions

Las Vegas Office
6069 South Fort Apache Road
Suite 100
Las Vegas, NV 89148

Map & Directions

Additional Offices

  • Los Angeles
  • San Bernardino
  • San Diego
  • Arroyo Grande
  • Phoenix
  • Riverside
  • Dallas

Follow Online

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or as forming an attorney-client relationship. No attorney-client relationship between the reader and Kazerouni Law Group APC is created by this site, and no reader should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content in this site.

Review Us